The novel Dune by Frank Herbert is
a futuristic story set on a desolate desert planet that serves as a resource
colony amongst an empire that spans across a universe. It mixes the future
setting with mystical and fantasy-like elements such as psychic mind powers and
divining the future. The book explores the concept of gender and sexism and the
balance of female and male elements, specifically in the powers of the main
character, Paul.
Paul, while
having an extremely ordinary and dull name, demonstrates extraordinary
abilities that combine powers previously divided between males and females. He
shares the psychic and mental abilities of the Bene Gesserit with his mother
Jessica, such as the powers of persuasion (“The Voice” – not the show) and
knowledge from genetic/instinctual origin. He also shows abilities from
training as a Mentat – a person who thinks in logical, rational terms, seen in
men. By combining these two methods of thinking – male and female, Paul is able
to show extraordinary new mental abilities, seeing into the future and grasping
knowledge he would have no way of knowing.
While Paul
is proclaimed to be an extraordinary being who combines the mental teachings of
both males and females, his personality and thoughts don’t really reflect this.
He just seems to become more distant and emotionally detached. He seems
ordinary still, despite his powers and knowledge. With this combination of male
and female elements, you might think he would exhibit more gender-neutral
aspects, maybe being attracted to both genders or none. Instead, he still
thinks like any other normal male. Other than being more mature than the
average 15-year-old boy, Paul’s personality doesn’t really live up to the
reverence of his abilities.
While the
book is progressive in its concepts of combining elements of both genders for
being written in 1965, Paul’s character seems to fall a bit flat. This may be a
tool for the author to demonstrate how someone who explores both genders can
still be normal. With modern perceptions of gender, however, I feel like it
just misses a few marks. Of course, this is just how it resonates in modern
times with values and perceptions that have shifted drastically from 1965. For
its time, the novel is remarkably progressive and forward thinking.
No comments:
Post a Comment